We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
because there is marginal evidence um that you know it can prevent tooth decay um and some of that evidence is weak at best you know forming a nanop particulate layer over the tooth and marginally producting the aluminum but I think you get the same thing I brushing with hydroxy appetite or um and just brushing your teeth
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.