The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The following year, I do a trail ride in the Canadian Rockies. I identify and decide that I plan to do a clinical trial. We get some senior scientist to help me design the trial. I write the grant, get funding, and in October 2010 we start the clinical trial. And in fact, we've published. Our first [inaudible 00:16:59] that through the protocol showing that it's safe, it's well tolerated, people can do it, and most important, we have dramatic impact on fatigue.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.