Paul Saladino· MD
Natural immunity> vaccine-induced immunity.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Natural immunity> vaccine-induced immunity.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in general when you are exposed to a virus you get a more diverse antibody response or profile than you do with just a monoclonal infusion there's two reasons why people think natural immunity is stronger more effective than vaccinated immunity one is you get a more diverse antibody portfolio in the response and the other is the reason monica alluded to and that is natural immunity is based in the mucosa it's more mucosal based immunity so it's more on the front lines of defense