The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the reason why it's interesting me so much more lately is thinking through and looking at the r in different types of conditions coming up so when I think it was more of the the big food Ultra processed Community Foods we had things like obesity diabetes Etc skyrocketing heart disease now we're it's in a very different realm of puberty infertility like really weird systemic changes that are that are new over the last like 10 15 20 years
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.