The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the other two are the infraspinatus and the teres minor and if you you can kind of superimpose them over the subscapularis but they're on the back side of the joint and they are very important they are the external rotators that it's they give us our backhand in tennis they give us a lot of stability far the shoulder itself and especially whether you're playing golf or lifting weights they're a dynamic stabilizer
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so the other two are the infraspinatus and the teres minor and if you you can kind of superimpose them over the subscapularis but they're on the back side of the joint and very important they are the external rotators it's they give us our backhand in tennis they give us a a lot of stability for the shoulder itself and especially whether you're playing golf or lifting weights they're a dynamic stabilizer they're very important doing bench press push-ups all sorts of activities like that archery archery yes very important