Peter Attia· MD
you might say that nader might be far down near 20 when you're 20. and by the time you're 80 it's not to 80 but by the time you're 80 it might be well above 30. might be in the low 30s where that that nader is
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you might say that nader might be far down near 20 when you're 20. and by the time you're 80 it's not to 80 but by the time you're 80 it might be well above 30. might be in the low 30s where that that nader is
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's really 30 32 where you see people 70 80 and above having that lowest uh mortality rate