The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
he basically said and not so many words like I'd rather die of a heart attack and feel this good then you know and he's not saying like I'm gonna die of a heart attack tomorrow but he's like look I'd rather live to sixty and feel this wave and live to 70 and not to which I say totally fair by the way like that's a very reasonable trade-off to make
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.