The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
many many cancers require as you said multidisiplinary care fancy way of saying you're going to need to think about surgery radiation therapy medical oncology olog management with drug therapy you want to have outstanding pathology you want to have genetic counselors you want to have great Imaging teams
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
cuz almost every patient with breast cancer is going to need to think about surgery radiation therapy medical oncology care many will also need to think about plastic or reconstructive surgery many will need to think about quality of the Imaging they get down the road they might need genetic testing you want folks who are working together all the time communicating with each other and handing the Baton back and forth as necessary