The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's a lot of uh uh data out there on especially people who were dealing in x-rays for dentistry and stuff like that back in the day when they didn't have shielding or anything like that that they would get dermatitis the most common thing you'd see is skin irritation in that sort of situation dermatitis and even some kind of chronic flaking and things like that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.