The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
fish is very highly contaminated with microplastics too these little tiny Plastics that are abundant in the oceans the bio accumulate that accumulating humans and that have been shown to disrupt hormones and fertility and animal models
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
fish is another big exposure of microplastics, too, because they're in the ocean. They're swimming in it literally, and they're bioaccumulating this.