We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
why is the nih not done a study on natural immunity they keep saying we don't know they're ignoring the 141 studies that have been documented by the brownstone institute it's not that hard go to new york where people had the infection interview them test their blood i mean why is my research team doing this without nih funding because the nih is not only not funding it they're not doing it and they're relying on two really flawed studies that the cdc put out
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.