Rhonda Patrick· PhD
But one of the reasons I'm so interested in this is because, well, inflammation really plays a role in a lot of diseases like cancer, but it really seems to be a driver of the aging process.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But one of the reasons I'm so interested in this is because, well, inflammation really plays a role in a lot of diseases like cancer, but it really seems to be a driver of the aging process.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And inflammation is at the core of aging. I mean, this is known. It is really, really one of the I would say molecular processes that is driving all these hallmarks of aging.