The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
absolutely we can absolutely scale it and we absolutely must scale it because this is this is the biggest this is a trick question can we scale regenerative agriculture to feed a growing population we must because chemical industrial agriculture isn't going to be able to feed a future generation right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's too expensive the truth is if you look at all the conservation land in this country if you look at all the conservation land in this country if you look at degraded lands that aren't being used properly if you look at land that's used to grow corn and soy for factory farm animals that could be converted and we can literally double the amount of cows we produce every year I'm regenerative farms than we do now not that we should not that we need all that meat but I'm just saying the argument that it's not scalable that's not cost-effective it's just not true