The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Uh but nevertheless, that's my point of view on this and I suspect I am heavily influenced by the fact that I have known three non-smokers who have um died from adnocarcinoma of the lung and uh I think you just can't help but be influenced by the question what would have happened if those cancers had been caught had been caught sooner.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.