Paul Saladino· MD
this change of species actually came because humans had to cope with hunting more smaller animals while still maintaining the same energetic efficiency
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
this change of species actually came because humans had to cope with hunting more smaller animals while still maintaining the same energetic efficiency
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so of course it cost energetically it's more more expensive