The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when you put sugar in it actually it feeds the fast metabolis fast metabolizing groups of bacteria and what happens is that eventually they'll start to take take the resources and they'll start to grow and they'll start to overpower the the other um the other forms when you look at the metabolome and the research that sees all the different changes that happens when you put different inputs into the mouth you see complete changes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.