The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think the human body we we're evolved really to handle this to a larger degree than we realize because again mamalian DNA we came from you know the background of the animal kingdom where there was tons of exposure from natural cosmic rays and whatnot
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think the human body we we're evolved really to handle this to a larger degree than we realize because again Mamon DNA we came from you know the background of the animal kingdom where there was tons of exposure from natural cosmic rays and whatnot and then you know our our predecessors had to be able to survive our DNA had to be somewhat resilient in order to get to this point
the human body we we're evolved really to handle this to a larger degree than we realize because again mamalian DNA we came from you know the background of the animal kingdom where there was tons of exposure from natural cosmic rays and whatnot and then you know our our predecessors had to be able to survive our DNA had to be somewhat resilient in order to get to this point i think it's more resilient than a lot of people give it credit for