The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and then they was picked up by pharmaceutical company and by the end of the 1940s they developed promising has the first anti-psychotic medication that would change completely the face of psychiatry and it may have just been simply a chemical contaminant / intermediary contaminant within them from the assimilation of for the same disease so they thought the benefit was methylene blue it was actually from a byproduct within
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.