The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
your your study is powered to detect like a a 70 difference in in all cause mortality in some you know they might be pointing something out that basically it's saying your study's Dead on Arrival if you actually run it this way right because there's no way you're going to see an effect size greater than 30 percent and yet you're only powered to detect it if it's 70 which is crazy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.