The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, we don't really understand this and I think it's just the better part of safety to think like, should I really be doing that? Like, do I get headaches? Look, if you're not having an issue with any of this stuff, keep living your life. Keep using the AirPods and rocking your life. But if somebody has headaches or mood swings, you know like why not just change and see is this affecting me?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.