Rhonda Patrick· PhD
And then you look at the error bars. Genetically identical animals sometimes in the same cage and the error bars get larger, and larger, and larger.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And then you look at the error bars. Genetically identical animals sometimes in the same cage and the error bars get larger, and larger, and larger.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So that says there is stochastic variation that's not due to genetic differences that causes identical animal to have some with a high burden of senescent cells, some with a low burden of senescent cells.