The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are microcytic anemias normal CITIC anemias and macro siddik anemias the mean corpuscular hemoglobin is a little bit more of an esoteric measure there's also an MCHC and we talked about the RDW a little bit but the MCV is really the one that you want to look at in conjunction
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if it's too high we think about a folate or a b12 problem if it's too low we think about an iron problem