The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and then do serial analyzes right you know so like in the in go with high-risk populations to prove this point if you like but so we we we can readily Envision how it is that we basically start to capture you know much bigger um uh section of the population
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I I think we're not quite at the imperative point but we're uh we're certainly at the point where I would say it's reasonable to get a test I mean if you consider yourself an early adopter and you know who you are um it's reasonable to get a test