The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the r-wave is giving you if my memory serves me correctly I'm sure there's a cardiologist listening who's going to scream right now but that's the peak electrical signal of the contraction of The ventricle exactly yeah I'm not cardiologist either but from my my memory that's correct as well
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and we're honing in on where those B2 be intervals are because ultimate to get HRV we need the exact amount of time from one heartbeat to the next because that's what we're quantifying so if you have electral signal you get a very clear clean signal that you can pull out those exact beatto beat intervals and that's where we fundamentally get heart rate variability from