The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the fairfax county water authority we can see what kind of garbage water i was drinking as a kid similar to austin all the same sorts of things hexavalent chromium that's definitely a good study for cancer all of these same things nitrates trihalomethanes these are pretty common it just tells you how much they are nitrate nitrite so tap water i drink as a kid was no better than the tap water that i was drinking or i would have drunk in austin texas
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.