Peter Attia· MD
they see a more immunologic injury they they they're you know depends on the circumstance they often require more immune suppression you know greater frequency of rejection
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they see a more immunologic injury they they they're you know depends on the circumstance they often require more immune suppression you know greater frequency of rejection
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the dialysis curve is going to drop off pretty quickly so the in fact the studies that have shown that where the dialysis and transplant curves cross even with the risks of undergoing a surgical procedure and starting immunosuppression occurs in less than a year it's probably in somewhere between 90 and 250 days depending on patient characteristics so so that's clear dialysis loses