The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and in the process that those amino acids that carbon that nitrogen is gonna come back into the people who live here who have lived here and who are not working here so I just don't think I would have ever understood that if someone tried to explain this to me five years ago I think I could have intellectually understood it but don't think I could have viscerally or emotionally understood it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.