The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the original estimate of the death toll which was in 1927 studied by the American Medical Association a guy named Edward Jordan infectious disease expert looked at the entire world and they originally estimated 21.7 million people died that was largely because they extrapolated the case mortality rate from the West where they had semi-good data to the rest of the world which turned out to be wrong
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the original estimate of the death toll which was in 1927 studied by the American Medical Association a guy named Edward Jordan infectious disease expert looked at the entire world and they originally estimated 21 point 7 million people died