The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we used to work on things for long periods of time and truthfully like let's say we work on something for three like as you said Parkinson's law work expands to fill the time available what we realized was that that project probably could have gotten done in half the time and probably been 95% as good and probably the stuff that we squeezed out was probably
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what we realized was that that project probably could have gotten done in half the time and probably been 95% as good and probably the stuff that we squeezed out was probably worth it