The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the outcomes on this there's one C thing to know about this the outcomes on this have been pretty much there's no head-to-head studies between the two but pretty good and they looked at both like improvements in this desire rating scale the fsfi as well as clinical events like satisfying sexual events and clinical meaningfulness has been good good moderate to solid outcomes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the outcomes on this have been pretty much there's no head-to-head studies between the two but pretty good and they've looked at both like improvements in this desire rating scale the fsfi as well as clinical events like satisfying sexual events and clinical meaningfulness has been good good moderate to deep solid outcomes