The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
most of the current approaches to coronavirus vaccines are not looking at the inactivated or attenuated strategies are they or am I just miss reading it because all of the stories that we're reading about the companies whether it be Pfizer the Oxford example Moderne example which i think is getting far more attention than it deserves I mean they're all looking at other sort of newer approaches of taking DNA or mRNA from these viruses or Spike proteins directly
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.