The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so I think a great future project would be to take that and look at exposures in think about it like your exposures in an environment with high smoke High pollution poor Foods and the epigenetic changes that occur when you're having a surge in your testosterone in your 20s that begins to hardwire that person's cells for future development of prostate cancer
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so you know what is their exposure to um you know epigenetic changes what's their exposure to smoking it's in general in urban you know populations of of black individuals there's more smoking it asks it correlates with the food deserts all these different kinds of epigenetic factors