Paul Saladino· MD
and that is amazing because it's sequester's more carbon it grows healthier plants it creates healthier michael raisa land root networks and it's sequester's more rain water
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and that is amazing because it's sequester's more carbon it grows healthier plants it creates healthier michael raisa land root networks and it's sequester's more rain water
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
they rotationally graze they compost all of the animal remains and waste back onto the soil and the bad ways the good ways the pool the pee and basically bones in parts of the animals that aren't used and mostly would throw in a garbage can or a landfill they put back onto the land the way that it's supposed to be as the Bison used to die on the land as a deer dies in the woods on the land and becomes a part of the soil that makes the soil so much richer when you touch the dirt when you see the dirt and white oak pastures you will see that is the color of chocolate it is dark it is incredibly dark and that is because it has so much organic matter in it