The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
why wouldn't you have all of the above is it literally a running out of real estate inside the cranium and if so why not get a bigger Cranium I mean neanderthals had bigger crane like again it's sort of a question that's unanswerable but I find these types of questions fascinating
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
humans traded out diversity of olfactory receptors that is the ability to sense a rich array of scents compared to other animals for evolution of that long AKA Red photopigment so trichromacy is of this ability to perceive in the color ranges that we perceive is a late stage Evolution and we traded out olfactory ability for that
there were variants of us that were randomly occurring that had those skills that got outc competed by the ones that had greater and greater visual acuity