The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the part that's attaches to the Bone it gets blood supply from that bone it gets blood supply gets nutrients it gets growth factors so our goal and this is jumping ahead a little bit our goal is to get that reattached to that bone so it can get all of those growth factors and that new healing back
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
our goal is to get that reattached to that bone so it can get all of those growth factors and that new healing back and it absolutely can heal back but there are certain limit ations to that