The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
It's it's it's it's been known since, you know, oh, at least since the 1950s, we have the the free radical theory of aging, which still is talked about a lot, but is is largely misunderstood because that's when I think to your point, the importance of reduction and the redux homeostasis is really, really important to understand why hydrogen is different than any other antioxidant.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.