The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i remember when i had h1n1 in 2000 what year would that have been nine nine ten i had it i never got tested for it but we finally put two and two together because my lfts hit a thousand i mean i was sick as a dog i was literally on the verge of getting a liver biopsy before my doc went wait i think that illness you had a month ago or two months ago was h1n1 let's wait another month before we stick a needle in your liver and sure enough my lft's returned to normal
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.