The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the analogy I always use is like a dandelion weed on your front lawn the higher the glein score the higher the probability that that person can have deep roots in their tumor extending outside the prostate potentially into the percal fat and Beyond and additionally you have a higher probability that that dandelion can go to seed and those seeds can float off to the lymph nodes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.