The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you have a very prominent distal ulna especially asymmetrically that's important to me because and especially if you had a traumatic accident these are commonly missed there's a some thick ligaments here the druj ligaments and those can allow the ulna to rise and the radius to fall away from that and it's it's very disabling especially for athletes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
prominent distal ulna especially asymmetrically that's important to me because and especially if you had a traumatic accident these are commonly missed there's a some thick ligaments here the druj ligaments and those can allow the ulna to rise and the radius to fall away from that and it's it's very disabling especially for athletes and so I see it in hockey players who take the slam and so I'm checking that and looking for that stability there as I as I rotate and watch it
if you walk in and you have a very prominent distal ulna especially asymmetrically that's important to me because and especially if you had a traumatic accident these are commonly missed there's a some thick ligaments here the druj ligaments and those can allow the ulna to rise and the radius to fall away from that and it's it's very disabling especially for athletes