The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
first of all it's the truth if you measure if you measure genotype it was hard for me to accept it and it's only recently that i convinced myself and the reason is that apple e2 genotype is also associated with diseases too it's not so simple
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
apo E2 genotype is also associated with diseases too it's not so simple ER