The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if everybody got a personalized tutor was his First point and second they did it to mastery. They worked to mastery. Right? So mastery based not tenure based. Correct. Just you have to know the material before you advance and there's an individual tutor to coach you. You will get two sigma better performance which is right your leftmost part of your curve. Your worst students are going to be at what today is considered the top 10%.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
You will get two sigma better performance which is right. Your worst students are going to be at what today is considered the top 10%. In a two sigma performance.
So mastery based not tenure based. >> Correct. Just you have to know the material before you advance and there's an individual tutor to coach you. >> You will get two sigma better performance which is right.