Paul Saladino· MD
Yeah, it was a high concentration. Yeah, we we it was like it was like over 10 milligram per liter was what what they were ended up getting.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Yeah, it was a high concentration. Yeah, we we it was like it was like over 10 milligram per liter was what what they were ended up getting.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And and and ultimately we want to have dosing where it's like x milligrams of hydrogen per kilogram of body weight. Okay? >> Like that's really the pharmarmacology wise, that's really what we want to end up getting to, but we're not quite there yet.
We really have to talk about the dose. So when we talk about the dose, we do that calculation, which is simply take the concentration and multiply it by the volume of water.
So like in like in this case, they were drinking like say 250 milliliters of water. So it's 10 milligram per liter. So they're, you know, they're down to 250 um or or 2.5 milligrams of hydrogen, right? And then but they would do that several times a day. Exactly. So So the total dose ends up being, you know, >> over 10 milligs of hydrogen per day.