The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you can see paddocks or you know pastures of land that originally were completely barren they showed us pictures completely decimated full of chemicals and now they're starting to grow things again as they've put and the way they do that is by putting animals on the land in an adaptive multipatic rotational grazing system
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the way they do that is by putting animals on the land in an adaptive multi-paddock rotational grazing system and so we got to go out and see the buffalo and the buffalo are their machine they put the buffalo on the land and the buffalo pooping and peeing is what regenerates the land