The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what if it's the virus that could wipe our civilization off the map again I don't think either of these extremes are correct but it became a good illustration of what would have to be true what do you have to believe if Tsarskoe v2 and co vid 19 will eradicate our species well you'd have to believe the following one there is no long term immunity to each successive infection is worse than the previous one and 3 no effective treatments will be developed
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.