Peter Attia· MD
so what do you notice when you look at this you notice that the bigger the Gap the bigger the effect size between the two groups the fewer subjects you need
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so what do you notice when you look at this you notice that the bigger the Gap the bigger the effect size between the two groups the fewer subjects you need
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so I appreciate everybody kind of bearing with me as I went through this power table it seems like one of the driest things in the world but but as my mentor once told me it's the single most important table you should ever familiarize yourself with if you want to be in the business of Designing clinical trials or basically any sort of experiment because it is just so easy to get this wrong and over or under power an experiment
so what do you notice when you look at this you notice that the bigger the Gap the bigger the effect size between the two groups the fewer subjects you need