Peter Attia· MD
if the answer to that is yes then by definition optimal weight is lower than what we think right though right yeah I know but we don't say we still don't really know what optimal weight is
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if the answer to that is yes then by definition optimal weight is lower than what we think right though right yeah I know but we don't say we still don't really know what optimal weight is
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so if the answer to that is yes then by definition optimal weight is lower than what we think right hum though right I know but we I would say we still don't really know what optimal weight is