The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
No, not necessarily, but what you want to do is you want to live a really, really healthy life and then essentially it ends. Like you want to maintain that health for the duration. Yeah. Um, so he kind of basically said that which is like you you basically just have that squaring of the morbid morbidity line. You basically live a great life and then you kind of just die. You die at the end.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you said look you could live to 80 in remarkable and perfect health and then when your life is over it ends very quickly and suddenly versus you could live to a 100 but you spend that last 20 years in a painful state of decline I think very few people would choose the latter even though they're living longer