The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
In other words, you are very likely to be capturing other healthy habits when you're trying to simply measure one thing. And of course that's the hallmark of doing experiments, right? The reason an experiment, particularly a randomized experiment and ideally a blinded randomized experiment as the gold standard, uh is so important is because it allows you to isolate one variable at a time and epidemiology does not allow you to do that.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.