Peter Attia· MD
and this other point though is to narrow that gap between the two it's that with the with the deceased donor you at least try to maximize the immuno compatibility and with the living donor you have much more flexibility correct
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and this other point though is to narrow that gap between the two it's that with the with the deceased donor you at least try to maximize the immuno compatibility and with the living donor you have much more flexibility correct
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.