The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
compare that to the typical drug addict who does the reverse they go into rehab and that's where they leave all of their cues and influences behind and then we you know once they get clean and they detox we send them back to the same place where they got addicted before and that is a much much harder uh uphill battle
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
compare that to the typical drug addict who does the reverse they go into rehab and that's where they leave all of their cues and influences behind and then we you know once they get clean and they detox we send them back to the same place where they got addicted before and that is much much harder a pill battle
compare that to the typical drug addict who does the reverse they go into rehab and that's where they leave all of their cues and uh influences behind and then we you know once they get clean and they detox we send them back to the same place where they got addicted before and uh that is much much harder uh a pill battle